I had expected that my journey to Humberstone to research the Fitties would encourage me to interrogate their aesthetic qualities. Aesthetics in life and within philosophical discourse are like the Cleethorpes mud; a sticky subject, somewhere to lose your way, to get stuck into. For now, in this moment, it is enough to say that aesthetics is just a word that describes how the appearance of things makes you feel. In the future and for most people who self-identify as artist, this definition will prove inadequate. I anticipated my trip would nurture my sensibilities and help me make a newsense. I wanted to discover why these ramshackle dwellings wear their aesthetic weight with such surety in our uncertain times. They are clad in many materials from rusted steel panels to fake stone, to the architects' ceder planks fixed with bronze nails. As I wander around in the rain I become interested in what this cladding covers over.
I was initially drawn through nostalgia to the earliest manifestations, the ones built in the1920's with lichen covered corrugated asbestos roofs. The uneven internal flooring where one room extends into another. The buildings are written through with the visible inscriptions of their extensions and repairs. Before I got there I was riddled with preconceptions, I clearly had an idea of why I liked the Fitties that was built on abstraction. To write can be to 'put simply', but prose are rarely adequate when it comes to feelings that come from under the surface of things.
I sat on a double seater settee in front of a two bar electric fire and read the history of the Fitties by Alan Dowling. A photocopy of the 2001 edition neatly bound in a black plastic A4 ring binder. The book is necessarily chronological and provides a context by describing the national picture a snapshot of the state of things. The lack of housing after the First World War, the desire to return to a more natural relationship with the world, the short lived quests for a utopian way of life that slotted neatly between both of the wars to end all wars. This was the time of the plotlands, the years before 1948 when town and country planning would regulate, legislate and police all building projects. I am conflicted; on the one hand I'm pleased that people were not allowed to build small strange bricolaged sheds everywhere and to shit willy nilly in the woods. On the other hand, I am intoxicated by these places and the times when people were allowed to build these shanty towns of idiosyncratic self-expression and Arcadian dreams. They stop me in my tracks.
I thought I would be immersed in the textures of flaking paint lifted gently by the sea air, the entropy of slow return through the sea's fantastical ability to draw things back to itself. I intended to revel in the homogenized yet disparate reused materials. Unified through the affectionate kiss of driftwood chic.
As I walked in the rain past the 320 plots I began to realise that this yearning for a measure of aesthetic weight was a distraction from the job at hand. The plotlands are interesting because they hold individual dreams and the potential to build something from nothing. The aesthetic charge is not the seaside's patina on the surface but the very human dreams realised within the dwellings' becoming. These dreams were built into the fabric of buildings years before they were provided with electricity or running water. The integrity of the buildings with their reused materials and individualism holds an aesthetic weight yet it is different to what I expected to find.
It is good in a way as it means I need to find this love of a place, this personal aspiration to make something with what is to hand as best you can. From cave to hovel to gothic cathedral; any building worth its salt grows from a dream and not a plan.


